Importantly, MMSE-Second Edition: Standard version (MMSE-2) scores can be switched from MMSE scores without any score conversion. In 2010, the MMSE-Second Edition, a revised version of the MMSE, was introduced. Accessed January 15, 2024.The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the most widely used cognitive screening test. Is the Montreal cognitive assessment culturally valid in a diverse geriatric primary care setting? Lessons from the Bronx. Stimmel MB, Orkaby AR, Ayers E, Verghese J, Nsubayi CK, Weiss EF.Is A Commonly Used Screening Tool For Cognitive Impairment Accurate In Diverse Populations? EurekAlert! January 10, 2024.“Lower Spanish and English MoCA cutpoints may improve diagnostic accuracy for identifying cognitive impairment in this group, highlighting the need for the creation and validation of accurate cognitive screeners for ethnoculturally and linguistically diverse older adults,” investigators concluded. The ROC analyses of the English screening had a 65% sensitivity and a 77% specificity, and the analyses of the Spanish screening had a 64% sensitivity and a 73% specificity). According to receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses, the English cutpoint should be ≤ 18.5 to classify mild cognitive impairment or dementia, and the Spanish cutpoint should be ≤16.5. Published data stated the MoCA cutpoint was a score of ≤ 23, but with this inaccurate cutpoint, the diverse participants in the study received a high false-positive rate (79%). The mean English Montreal Cognitive Assessment score was 18.6, and the mean Spanish score was 16.7. After screening, a neuropsychologist determined a cognitive status as either normal with subjective cognitive concerns (90 participants, a mean score of 19.9), mild cognitive impairment (133 participants, a mean score of 16.6), and dementia (8 participants, mean score of 10.6). 2 The cohort included 72% women with a mean age of 73 years old.Ībout half completed the test in English (49%) and half in Spanish (51%). Investigators of the new study screened 231 participants with 43% Hispanic and 39% Black/African American. Furthermore, a cutoff core of ≤ 22 points demonstrated good sensitivity (96%) and specificity (88%).Īlthough, as stated on MoCA's official website, a Thai sample showed the optimal cut-off score of <24/30, yielding a 81% sensitivity and 86% specificity. 3 When having a cutoff score of ≤ 24 points, it demonstrated good sensitivity for detecting impairment (95%) with improved specificity (63%). 2Īccording to research in 2020 which evaluated the cognitive impairment of 81 African Americans, the recommended MoCA cutoff score for impairment of ≤ 26 resulted in 100% sensitivity with a low 31% specificity for identifying mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Efficacy and validity of cognitive screening in diverse populations was previously unclear. Stimmel and colleagues wanted to see if currently published English and Spanish cut points for cognitive impairment in the MoCA were appropriate in diverse community-based populations. “These findings underscore the importance of considering cultural factors and social determinants of health when evaluating performances on cognitive screening tools such as the MoCA, particularly in traditionally underserved communities,” said lead investigator Marnina Stimmel, PhD, of the Montefiore Health System and Albert Einstein College of Medicine in Bronx, New York, in a press release. When investigators screened adults aged ≥ 65 years old from Bronx, New York with cognitive issues, they found Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) cut points for mild cognitive impairment or dementia were "inappropriately high" when compared to neuropsychological testing, with a a high false-positive rate for detecting cognitive impairment observed with the score. A commonly used screening tool to detect cognitive impairment is not accurate when used in a diverse population of older adults, according to a new study.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |